When Shane Lake and Tony Charles stepped into Dragons’ Den in 2007, they weren’t holding a flashy gadget or quirky invention. They came with a vision: transform the way people ordered takeout food in the UK. Their startup, Hungryhouse, was an online platform that let customers browse restaurants and place orders without picking up the phone. They asked for £100,000 in exchange for 11% equity.

The Pitch

Hungryhouse wasn’t about inventing something new—it was about digitizing an everyday behavior. The entrepreneurs explained how the platform connected customers with local restaurants, replacing paper menus and phone calls with the convenience of a few clicks.

Their unique selling point was timing. In 2007, online food ordering was still a novelty in the UK. They had already signed up hundreds of restaurants and demonstrated steady growth in order volumes, signaling that the shift to digital was inevitable.

The hook was clear: if food delivery was going online, Hungryhouse was positioned to ride the wave.

The Negotiation

The Dragons were intrigued, but the questions came quickly. Could the business scale beyond a niche? Would restaurants adopt the technology fast enough? And could Hungryhouse survive if larger players entered the market?

Shane and Tony stayed composed. They emphasized traction with existing restaurants and growing customer demand, painting the picture of a big, untapped market. Their confidence was methodical, not flashy—their belief in the model shone through.

Some Dragons remained unconvinced, but James Caan and Duncan Bannatyne saw potential. After hard negotiation, they agreed to invest £100,000 for 50% equity between them—far more than the founders originally intended to give up, but enough to fuel growth.

The Outcome

With Dragon backing, Hungryhouse scaled quickly. The company became one of the UK’s best-known online takeaway platforms, competing head-to-head with Just Eat. Eventually, Hungryhouse was acquired by Delivery Hero, and later merged into Just Eat in a multi-million-pound deal that cemented its place in UK food tech history.

What started as a risky pitch in the Den ended up as part of one of Europe’s largest food delivery consolidations.

My Takeaway

Hungryhouse’s story shows that timing is everything in digital disruption. The Dragons who doubted people would order food online underestimated how fast consumer behavior could change.

It also highlights a key startup strategy: sometimes you don’t have to dominate a market—you just need to build enough traction to become a valuable acquisition target.

Fun Bit

Back in 2007, the idea of ordering dinner from a website instead of calling your local takeaway sounded futuristic to some Dragons. Less than a decade later, it had become the norm—and Hungryhouse was part of the reason why.

My Question for You

If you were in the Den, would you have believed in online food delivery before it became mainstream?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

When James Watt and Martin Dickie walked into Dragons’ Den in 2009, they weren’t polished entrepreneurs. They were two Scottish brewers with a rebellious streak, a handful of bottles, and a dream of shaking up the stale beer market. Their ask was £100,000 for 20% equity. What happened next became one of the most famous missed opportunities in Dragons’ Den history.

The Pitch

The founders introduced BrewDog as a new kind of beer company—independent, bold, unapologetically punk. While mainstream lagers dominated pubs and supermarkets, they were crafting small-batch, flavorful beers with attitude.

Their hook wasn’t just the product, it was the culture. “Beer for punks,” they said, a movement as much as a beverage. They shared early wins: local pubs couldn’t keep their beer in stock, and a grassroots following was already taking shape.

Subscribe now

The Negotiation

The Dragons liked the taste but had doubts about the business. Could two rebellious brewers scale production? Could their edgy brand survive the transition to mass retail?

James and Martin stayed true to their ethos. They leaned into their punk image, highlighting authenticity over polish. Their passion was clear, but their unconventional style clashed with the Dragons’ expectations of what investable entrepreneurs should look and sound like.

In the end, the Dragons weren’t convinced. They passed.

The Outcome

Walking away without a deal might have sunk other startups—but not BrewDog. James and Martin doubled down on their vision. They pioneered “Equity for Punks,” a crowdfunding campaign that allowed fans to buy into the brand directly. It raised tens of millions, fueling rapid expansion.

BrewDog grew into one of the world’s largest and most recognizable craft beer companies, opening bars, breweries, and distribution channels across the globe. At its peak, the brand was valued at over $2 billion.

Dragons’ Den had let one of the biggest fish slip through its net.

My Takeaway

BrewDog’s story shows that authenticity and cultural edge can sometimes matter more than polish. The Dragons didn’t see past the scrappy presentation—but James and Martin proved that vision and brand identity could build a global powerhouse.

For entrepreneurs, the lesson is simple: not every investor will understand your vision. The right audience might just be your customers themselves.

Fun Bit

BrewDog became famous for outrageous stunts: brewing the world’s strongest beers, packaging them in taxidermy animals, and cheekily trolling big beer brands. Their marketing made as many headlines as their drinks.

My Question for You:

Would you have invested in two punk brewers when the Dragons wouldn’t?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

Subscribe now

When Levi Roots walked into the Den in 2007, he didn’t just pitch a product—he performed one. Guitar in hand, he sang his way into the Dragons’ hearts with a reggae-infused tune about his family’s jerk barbecue sauce. His ask was simple: £50,000 for 20% equity. What followed was a pitch that became a cultural milestone for Dragons’ Den.

The Pitch

Levi didn’t have flashy charts or investor decks. What he had was authenticity. He sang about his “Reggae Reggae Sauce,” weaving Jamaican culture and family tradition into every word. It was bold, unusual, and instantly memorable.

He explained how he’d been selling the sauce at food festivals and receiving rave feedback. The unique selling point was clear—this wasn’t just a condiment, it was an authentic recipe with a story behind it.

The Negotiation

The Dragons were charmed, but cautious. Could a musician-turned-chef really scale a sauce brand? Could he handle production, distribution, and the brutal realities of retail?

Levi’s relaxed confidence helped ease the doubts. He didn’t posture or push too hard; his charisma carried him. The essence of his pitch wasn’t about flawless business planning—it was about cultural authenticity and the potential for a brand bigger than the product itself.

Peter Jones and Richard Farleigh saw the spark. They pressed him on logistics, but ultimately recognized that the sauce, combined with Levi’s personality, could become a household name.

The Outcome

Jones and Farleigh invested £50,000 for 40% equity, and Levi’s life changed overnight. Within weeks, Reggae Reggae Sauce hit Sainsbury’s shelves, quickly selling out. The brand grew into a national sensation, expanding into frozen foods, snacks, cookbooks, and even restaurant ventures.

What started as a quirky musical pitch became one of Dragons’ Den’s greatest investment success stories.

My Takeaway

Levi Roots proved that investors don’t just back products—they back people. His sauce might have been delicious, but it was his passion, story, and cultural authenticity that sealed the deal. Numbers matter, but charisma and vision can tip the scales when the product resonates.

For entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: if your story is genuine and your passion is undeniable, it can be just as powerful as any spreadsheet.

Fun Bit

Levi’s reggae song became legendary. Fans still remember it as one of the most entertaining pitches in Dragons’ Den history—proof that sometimes, singing your business plan really does work.

My Question for You:

If you were in the Den, would you have taken a chance on a singing chef with a homemade sauce recipe?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When the Kang sisters—Arum, Dawoon, and Soo—stepped into the Tank, they weren’t pitching just another swipe-based dating app. They introduced Coffee Meets Bagel, a platform designed to slow dating down, offering curated, meaningful matches instead of endless swiping. Their ask was $500,000 for 5% equity. What unfolded became one of the most unforgettable episodes in Shark Tank history.

The Pitch

The sisters spoke directly to the frustrations many people felt with the dating landscape. Instead of quick, shallow swipes, Coffee Meets Bagel delivered one high-quality match—or “bagel”—per day, powered by social connections and algorithms.

Their emotional hook was powerful: this wasn’t about hookups, it was about relationships. The sisters highlighted growing traction, particularly in urban markets, and pointed to data that proved people were engaging deeply with their platform.

The Negotiation

The Sharks listened with curiosity but weren’t fully convinced. They raised concerns about scalability, fierce competition from giants like Tinder and Match, and whether users would stick with such a controlled, slower experience.

Then came the shock. Mark Cuban offered $30 million to buy Coffee Meets Bagel outright—the largest cash offer in Shark Tank history. The room froze. The other Sharks looked on, astonished at both the size of the offer and the weight of the decision now hanging on the sisters.

Despite the pressure, the Kang sisters stood calm, smiling but firm. Their conviction in their long-term vision never wavered. Cuban’s offer was tempting, but they believed Coffee Meets Bagel could become much bigger than a quick payday.

The Outcome

In a moment that stunned viewers, the sisters turned down Cuban’s offer. No deal was made.

Outside the Tank, Coffee Meets Bagel went on to raise venture funding, grow its user base worldwide, and carve out a respected space in the dating app industry. While it never overtook Tinder, it became known as the app for people looking for more serious, lasting relationships.

My Takeaway

This pitch wasn’t about whether Cuban’s $30 million was “enough.” It was about vision. The Kang sisters showed that true conviction sometimes means walking away from the biggest check on the table.

It’s a reminder to entrepreneurs: Shark Tank is not only about getting a deal—it’s about proving belief in your mission, even when the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Fun Bit

The rejection of Cuban’s offer still ranks as one of Shark Tank’s most dramatic moments. Fans continue to debate whether it was genius or a mistake—but either way, it cemented Coffee Meets Bagel in Shark Tank legend.

My Question for You:

Would you have turned down $30 million for a chance to chase your vision?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When John Tabis, a former Disney and ShoeDazzle marketer, stepped onto Shark Tank, he wasn’t pitching just another flower delivery service. He was pitching a complete overhaul of a tired, fee-filled industry. With the support of his co-founder and farmer partner Juan Pablo, John asked the Sharks for $258,000 in exchange for 3% equity in The Bouqs Co.—a direct-to-consumer floral business promising fresher, fairer flowers.

The Pitch

The story behind Bouqs was as simple as it was compelling: cut out the middlemen, stop overpricing, and deliver flowers directly from sustainable farms in South America. John explained that most flowers sold online traveled through multiple wholesalers before reaching customers, losing freshness and adding unnecessary costs.

Bouqs would change that by offering cut-to-order flowers shipped directly from eco-friendly farms, ensuring better quality and fairer prices. The pitch leaned into romance, authenticity, and sustainability while John positioned the brand as “the Warby Parker for flowers.” He emphasized early traction and painted a picture of a floral industry ripe for disruption.

The Negotiation

The Sharks admired John’s polish and storytelling, but they weren’t convinced the numbers supported his lofty valuation.

Dynamics
They grilled him on logistics—how could flowers shipped from South America arrive quickly enough to satisfy U.S. customers? Would delays ruin birthdays, anniversaries, and weddings? Kevin O’Leary pressed on margins and customer acquisition costs, while others doubted the scalability of such a model.

Body Language & Confidence
John remained calm and composed, his marketing background evident in his confidence. But the Sharks’ skeptical expressions made it clear they weren’t buying in.

Essence of the Pitch
The idea was strong, and the story resonated. But execution risks—especially tied to international logistics—proved to be a wall the Sharks weren’t willing to climb.

The Outcome

John left Shark Tank without a deal. The valuation seemed too high, and the model looked risky. But rejection didn’t slow him down. Bouqs raised funding outside the Tank and steadily grew into one of the most recognizable names in online flower delivery.

In a twist of fate, some Sharks circled back years later as Bouqs flourished. Robert Herjavec even partnered with the company for his own wedding flowers. Today, Bouqs has raised millions, scaled into a powerhouse, and proven itself as one of the most successful Shark Tank “missed opportunities.”

My Takeaway

Bouqs shows that a Shark Tank rejection isn’t the end of the road—it can be the start of a bigger one. John’s pitch was ahead of its time, and while the Sharks weren’t ready to buy in, the market was. For entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: a strong brand vision, a disruptive story, and persistence can eventually outgrow early investor doubts.

Fun Bit

Daymond John later admitted he regretted passing on Bouqs, calling it one of the show’s great missed opportunities. For fans of the Tank, it’s a reminder that even the Sharks don’t always smell the roses.

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When Evan Mendelsohn and Nick Morton walked into Shark Tank, they weren’t dressed like your typical entrepreneurs. The lawyer-and-dentist duo had traded in their professional careers for something far quirkier: outrageous, high-quality “ugly” Christmas sweaters. Their ask was straightforward—$100,000 for 5% equity.

The Pitch

The founders tapped into a growing cultural craze. Ugly sweater parties were booming, but most sweaters on the market were thrift store finds or cheaply made. Evan and Nick positioned Tipsy Elves as the premium, funny, and bold alternative.

Their pitch mixed sharp storytelling with playful energy. They spoke about the joy and humor behind their brand, but also emphasized real traction—sales were climbing fast, and the media buzz around ugly sweaters was undeniable. They made it clear this wasn’t a fad they were chasing; it was a movement they were helping to define.

The Negotiation

The Sharks weren’t shy about poking holes. Kevin O’Leary pressed hard on the seasonality problem: could a business built on Christmas sweaters survive the rest of the year? Other Sharks questioned whether the niche was too narrow.

Evan and Nick leaned on confidence and charisma. Their upbeat tone and humor kept the room light while they defended their growth strategy. They framed ugly sweaters not just as a seasonal gag but as an entry point into novelty apparel—costumes, patriotic gear, ski outfits, and more.

The real believer was Robert Herjavec. He saw brand potential far beyond December and understood the cultural power of humor. While O’Leary stayed skeptical, Robert made an offer: $100,000 for 10% equity. The cousins accepted.

The Outcome

With Robert’s backing, Tipsy Elves transformed from a quirky holiday business into a year-round lifestyle brand. The company expanded into costumes, party gear, and themed apparel for every season and occasion. Sales skyrocketed, crossing tens of millions annually, and Tipsy Elves became one of Shark Tank’s most iconic success stories.

My Takeaway

Tipsy Elves proves that even a seasonal, niche product can scale into a powerhouse with the right brand vision. By combining humor with quality, Evan and Nick built more than a sweater company—they built a cultural symbol. Their pitch also showed how charisma and levity can be just as important in negotiation as hard numbers.

Fun Bit

During the pitch, the Sharks couldn’t resist laughing at the bold designs, with some even trying the sweaters on. Kevin O’Leary, never one to miss a quip, joked about whether wearing one might make him look “too good”—a rare lighthearted moment from “Mr. Wonderful.”

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When cousins Jim Tselikis and Sabin Lomac wheeled their food truck onto Shark Tank, they weren’t just offering lobster rolls. They were offering a taste of home. Their ask was simple: $55,000 for 5% equity—a small sum compared to the ocean-sized ambition behind their pitch.

The Pitch

The story began in Maine, where lobster isn’t just food, it’s a way of life. Jim and Sabin grew up surrounded by the culture of fresh-caught seafood and wanted to share it with the world. When they moved to Los Angeles, they noticed one thing missing from its food scene: authentic lobster rolls.

Their hook was powerful—real Maine lobster, shipped directly and served fresh on toasted rolls. No imitation, no shortcuts. They let the Sharks taste for themselves, and the reaction said it all. The cousins combined family heritage, food authenticity, and proof of demand from their successful LA food truck to show this was more than a small operation. It was a brand in the making.

The Negotiation

At first, the Sharks peppered the cousins with questions about scalability. How could they consistently source lobster? How would they keep quality the same across multiple trucks or restaurants?

Jim and Sabin leaned on their calm confidence. They didn’t flinch. Their body language communicated belief in their brand, and they turned every challenge back to their strengths: direct sourcing from Maine, an unshakable commitment to authenticity, and customer loyalty already proven in LA.

The real turning point came with Barbara Corcoran. She had a proven track record scaling food concepts and understood the power of brand storytelling. Where others saw logistical headaches, Barbara saw an opportunity to turn lobster rolls into a national franchise. She made an offer: $55,000 for 15% equity.

The cousins accepted.

The Outcome

Barbara’s investment lit the fire. From a single food truck, Cousins Maine Lobster grew into a fleet of trucks across the U.S., brick-and-mortar restaurants, and even a thriving e-commerce business delivering lobster straight to doorsteps.

What started as a pitch for a single truck became a multi-million-dollar company, celebrated not just for its food but for keeping authenticity at its core.

My Takeaway

Cousins Maine Lobster shows how powerful a simple formula can be: a great product, a deep-rooted story, and the right partner. Authenticity isn’t just a buzzword here—it’s the reason customers lined up, and the reason investors paid attention. And by starting small with a food truck, they proved the demand before scaling up.

Fun Bit

When the Sharks bit into their lobster rolls on set, Mark Cuban’s face lit up immediately—proof that sometimes the product really does sell itself. Barbara, meanwhile, laughed as she declared she was “hooked” before reeling in her deal.

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When David Heath and Randy Goldberg stepped onto Shark Tank, they weren’t pitching the next hot gadget or flashy app. They came with socks. Their ask: $200,000 for 5% equity.

The catch? For every pair sold, they’d donate one to a homeless shelter. A mission wrapped in comfort. What sounded like “just socks” soon became one of the show’s biggest wins.

The Pitch

The founders began with that unforgettable stat: socks are the most requested clothing item in homeless shelters. It caught the Sharks off guard. Then came the reveal—Bombas weren’t ordinary socks.

They pulled up their pant legs and showed off the product. Arch support stitched into the middle. A blister tab at the heel to stop rubbing. Reinforced seams where socks usually fail. Even the way they hugged the foot was different.

Suddenly, “just socks” didn’t feel so ordinary. And when paired with a one-for-one donation model, it became a story of comfort with impact.

The Negotiation

Skepticism First
Mark Cuban shrugged off the idea, saying the sock market was crowded. Kevin O’Leary drilled into numbers and suggested scaling would be tough. Robert Herjavec questioned whether a social mission could make people buy socks.

Holding Their Ground
Heath and Goldberg stayed calm, delivering their numbers and sticking to their story. Their tone wasn’t flashy—it was steady, almost quiet confidence.

Daymond’s Move
Daymond John leaned in. Unlike the others, he saw brand potential. With his fashion background, he knew a mission-driven apparel company could build loyalty that went beyond fabric. He made an offer: $200,000 for 17.5% equity.

The room had been filled with doubt—but now the deal was sealed.

The Outcome

The Sharks who passed had no idea they were watching the birth of Shark Tank’s biggest money-maker. With Daymond’s backing, Bombas scaled quickly. The founders perfected their DTC model, built a community-driven brand, and turned a single product into a movement.

Fast forward: Bombas has crossed $1 billion in revenue and donated more than 100 million items. From a sock pitch that almost slipped through the cracks, Bombas became proof that social good and profit can grow side by side.

My Takeaway

Bombas is a reminder that mission alone isn’t enough—the product must stand tall on its own. Their socks were genuinely better, and the mission gave customers an extra reason to buy.

And in Shark Tank, choosing the right partner made all the difference. Daymond didn’t just see socks. He saw brand, culture, and scale. That vision helped Bombas step into the billion-dollar club.

Fun Bit

The name “Bombas” means “bumblebee” in Latin—a nod to teamwork, community, and hard work. It’s why a little bee is stitched on every pair. Even their branding buzzes with meaning.

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When Jamie Siminoff walked into Shark Tank in 2013, he wasn’t pitching a sponge or a snack. He was pitching the future of home security. His invention, then called Doorbot, was a Wi-Fi–enabled video doorbell that let homeowners see and speak to visitors from anywhere.

His ask: $700,000 for 10% equity.

The Sharks liked the idea. They didn’t like the valuation. What followed was one of the most famous rejections in Shark Tank history.

The Pitch

Siminoff started with a pain point everyone knew: missed packages, unwanted strangers, and an outdated doorbell that hadn’t changed in decades. His solution? A connected smart doorbell that put the homeowner in control.

The demo was straightforward—visitor rings the bell, homeowner answers on their phone. Simple. Relatable. A glimpse into the connected-home future.

The product was the first of its kind, and Siminoff leaned hard into that. He positioned Doorbot as the next big thing in security and convenience. But while the concept grabbed attention, the Sharks weren’t sold on whether it could scale.

The Negotiation

The Push and Pull
Kevin O’Leary zeroed in on numbers, as always. He questioned costs and customer adoption. His counter: a royalty-based deal instead of equity. It was safe for him, risky for Siminoff.

Daymond John and Barbara Corcoran backed away, worried about competition from established home security brands. Mark Cuban didn’t see the market fit.

Siminoff’s Stance
He stayed calm, even when visibly frustrated. His conviction was clear: Doorbot was ahead of its time. But his valuation—$7M pre-money—was too rich for investors who didn’t see the vision.

The Crux
The Sharks saw a “nice gadget.” Siminoff saw the future of the smart home. That gap in vision was the dealbreaker.

The Outcome

No deal. Jamie Siminoff walked out empty-handed.

But here’s the twist: Shark Tank exposure drove massive sales. Customers loved it. Investors outside the Tank loved it. Doorbot rebranded as Ring, raised big VC money, and grew into a household name.

Then, in 2018, Amazon bought Ring for over $1 billion.

The rejection that stung on national TV became one of the greatest comeback stories in startup history.

My Takeaway

Ring is proof that a “no” today can become a billion-dollar “yes” tomorrow.

A few key lessons:

• Exposure matters. Even rejection can bring customers and investors.

• Timing is everything. The Sharks didn’t see the smart home wave coming—but Siminoff did.

• Know your worth. A valuation may seem crazy now, but markets reward bold vision.

Fun Bit

Years later, Jamie Siminoff came back to Shark Tank—not as a contestant, but as a guest Shark. Talk about a full-circle moment. The very panel that once passed on him now welcomed him to their side of the table.

Question for you:

👉 If you were Jamie Siminoff, would you have taken Kevin O’Leary’s royalty deal just to land a Shark—or held firm like he did?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share

🔥 More Stories 🔥

When Aaron Krause walked into Shark Tank, he wasn’t holding a fancy gadget or a tech startup. He had… a sponge. A smiling one. His ask: $100,000 for 10% equity. The Sharks didn’t know it yet, but this quirky sponge was about to become one of the show’s biggest success stories.

The Pitch

Krause didn’t waste a second. He dunked his sponge into cold water—firm for scrubbing pans. Then into warm water—soft and gentle for glassware. The demo was simple, but brilliant.

And that smile? It wasn’t just for looks. The mouth cleaned utensils, the eyes gave you grip. Add to that: it didn’t smell, lasted longer than a regular sponge, and made cleaning (almost) fun.

The Sharks leaned in. Krause’s energy was contagious. He wasn’t selling a sponge. He was selling a cleaning revolution.

The Negotiation

The Room Heats Up
Kevin O’Leary poked at margins. Daymond John asked about branding. But it was Lori Greiner who lit up the second she heard “no odor” and “mass market.” She saw dollar signs—and QVC airtime.

Confidence Under Fire
Krause stood tall, smiling as wide as his sponge. He fielded questions with ease. No nerves, no stumbles—just proof his product worked.

The Hook
What really sold it wasn’t just the sponge. It was the combo of utility + mass appeal. Everyone hates scrubbing dishes. Krause had solved a universal pain point with something clever, affordable, and impossible to forget.

Shark Tactics

• O’Leary pressed numbers hard.

• Daymond circled branding angles.

• Lori played her ace: QVC dominance.

It was classic Shark Tank: testing, probing, jockeying. But Krause never flinched.

The Outcome

Lori dropped the winning offer: $200,000 for 20% equity. Twice the money, twice the stake. She bet big on her ability to take Scrub Daddy straight into America’s kitchens.

Krause took the deal. The handshake sealed one of Shark Tank’s most iconic partnerships.

My Takeaway

Scrub Daddy proves that simplicity sells—if you solve a real pain point and show it clearly. Krause’s demo was unforgettable, his ask was modest, and his confidence never wavered.

The biggest lesson? Pick the right partner. Lori wasn’t the highest bidder. She was the smartest one. And her QVC machine turned a smiling sponge into a multi-million-dollar brand.

Fun Bit

The look on Lori’s face when the sponge firmed up in cold water? Pure gold. That single moment probably sold her before the numbers even hit the table.

Question for you:

👉 If you were in Krause’s shoes, would you have taken Lori’s 20% deal—or pushed harder to stick with your original 10% ask?

Subscribe now

Join us: ➡️ Instagram | Telegram | X ⬅️

Share